<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>I can't really decide if I should argue for the equalness of man or the 'best' economic and socially - Comments</title>
		<link>http://talkersation.com/topic/i-cant-really-decide-if-i-should-argue-for-the-equalness-of-man-or-the-best-economic-and-socially</link>
		<description>I can't decide if I should argue for human rights, equality and forgiveness or if I should go with what's 'best' for mankind in the long run (looking at the big picture insted of the small ones). I'd say that both sides are full of ignorance, so the battle seems to be between hope and dreams that it can all survive against calculations and avoiding risks.</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:49:41 UTC</pubDate>
		<language>en</language>
		<item>
			<title>DriedPlum</title>
			<link>http://talkersation.com/topic/i-cant-really-decide-if-i-should-argue-for-the-equalness-of-man-or-the-best-economic-and-socially#c170-text</link>
			<description>My take on that is neither. My alignment has always been neutral (if you put it in the Neverwinter Nights way). I'm a fair share of liberalism and conservatism and I personally believe that's where I'm best at. You'd rather get on with what you want to do instead of being bothered to settle between which of two equal sides are better, IMHO. Both sides are equally corruptible anyway. :U</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:20:24 UTC</pubDate>
			<guid>http://talkersation.com/topic/i-cant-really-decide-if-i-should-argue-for-the-equalness-of-man-or-the-best-economic-and-socially#c170-text</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>